<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InverseFlux: The Blog 3.0 &#187; Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inverseflux.com/category/rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inverseflux.com</link>
	<description>I still need soap for my brain...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congratulations Microsoft!</title>
		<link>http://inverseflux.com/2009/12/04/congratulations-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://inverseflux.com/2009/12/04/congratulations-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InverseFlux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inverseflux.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a bit, why not kick things off again with a rant! Official Post. I was wondering what had happened last night, as Bing is my default search on my Dell Inspiron 10v netbook.  In the middle of working on something, non-critical, the usual &#8216;hey, let me look that part up!&#8217; occurred, to which <a href='http://inverseflux.com/2009/12/04/congratulations-microsoft/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a bit, why not kick things off again with a rant!</p>
<p>Official <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/12/04/a-note-about-today-s-outage.aspx#comments" target="_blank">Post</a>.</p>
<p>I was wondering what had happened last night, as Bing is my default search on my Dell Inspiron 10v netbook.  In the middle of working on something, non-critical, the usual &#8216;hey, let me look that part up!&#8217; occurred, to which I received a 500 error. For the non-tech reading this, 500 error is usually what shows up when the server can&#8217;t process the request you fired off to it. After a few twitch F5(refresh) taps, I was laughing pretty good and just used Google in the meantime.</p>
<p>The part that isn&#8217;t so amusing to me, is that they are missing about 15-30 minutes of outage time in the report given above, as a guess, they probably found out about this at 8:30PM Arizona time, but in all reality, errors started occurring much much sooner.</p>
<p>/sigh</p>
<p>BBC <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8394676.stm" target="_blank">Stated</a>, &#8220;Not all aspects of the Bing service were knocked out by the configuration change. Many reported that Bing Maps was still available.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow! That&#8217;s so great! Maps was working! &#8230;. &#8230;.. &#8230;.. &#8230;..</p>
<p>THE MAIN REASON YOUR SITE EXISTS WAS DOWN, but hey! Bing Maps was working!</p>
<p>@Bing: why?  You were doing so well. From the semi-clever &#8216;decision engine&#8217; campaign to everyone was making fun of you, I really saw this as a new opportunity for you to reinvent your appeal to the public in software services. Now, now everything everyone was making fun of you about is actually true, again.</p>
<p>&#8230; &#8230;. &#8230;.. &#8230;. &#8230;. &#8230;..</p>
<p>Alright, alright. Truly, most of the above is complete sarcasm. I find it amusing how quickly people love to bash the shit out of Microsoft at any chance they can get. Nevermind it being the main source of  how most get to these places. Oh wait, people bash that too. Doesn&#8217;t get old after over 10 years of doing it? I swear, I think people have just gotten used to doing it and reading it. Notice how everyone mentions Google at some point or another in their posts, but how quickly everyone forgot that it too just went <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/14/googles-outage-was-asias-fault/" target="_blank">down</a> earlier this year.</p>
<p>Back off, give them a fucking break considering it was an hour without your precious Bing and an hour without your precious Google, respectively. Oh wait, no one complained about Google. Tenure you say? Hmmm, pretty sure Microsoft/MSN/Live/Bing has been around a<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=metric+fuckton" target="_blank"> metric-fuckton</a> longer then Google. But Google does do a lot of things very right. It is a pickle.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inverseflux.com/2009/12/04/congratulations-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death</title>
		<link>http://inverseflux.com/2009/08/10/death/</link>
		<comments>http://inverseflux.com/2009/08/10/death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InverseFlux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inverseflux.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holey rusted metal Batman!  Can we get some death with a side of death to go?  Apparently!  From John Hughes to tr.im, the past week has been slightly emo. The one URL trimmer I liked using with twidroid is dead and the dude who made movies for everyone to relate to are both gone.  I <a href='http://inverseflux.com/2009/08/10/death/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holey rusted metal Batman!  Can we get some death with a side of death to go?  Apparently!  From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hughes_(director)" target="_blank">John Hughes</a> to <a href="http://tr.im/">tr.im</a>, the past week has been slightly emo.</p>
<p>The one URL trimmer I liked using with <a href="http://twidroid.com/" target="_blank">twidroid</a> is dead and the dude who made movies for everyone to relate to are both gone.  I am actually more sad about these two things then I am about Michael-fucking-Jackson dying.  I mean, really, tr.im never mollested anyone?  Neither did John Hughes&#8230; hell neither even went to court over the shit!</p>
<p>Arg, so frustrating.  Thought about firing off my own URL shortner site, but oh look, a <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=metric+fuckton" target="_blank">metric-fuckton</a> of domain squatters beat me to it!</p>
<p>FML</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inverseflux.com/2009/08/10/death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome OS?</title>
		<link>http://inverseflux.com/2009/07/08/google-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://inverseflux.com/2009/07/08/google-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InverseFlux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inverseflux.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both posts are from a single source, but here they are to bring you up to speed if you don&#8217;t know what it all is. http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/168036/google_set_to_take_on_microsoft_with_desktop_os.html 5 hours later&#8230; http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/168058/five_reasons_google_chrome_os_will_fail.html Really? Nope. Nope. Possibly. Nope.  And, Nope.  Just as David Coursey is allowed an opinion, here goes an attempt at mine. 1. Netbooks will be <a href='http://inverseflux.com/2009/07/08/google-chrome-os/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both posts are from a single source, but here they are to bring you up to speed if you don&#8217;t know what it all is.</p>
<p>http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/168036/google_set_to_take_on_microsoft_with_desktop_os.html</p>
<p>5 hours later&#8230;</p>
<p>http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/168058/five_reasons_google_chrome_os_will_fail.html</p>
<p>Really? Nope. Nope. Possibly. Nope.  And, Nope.  Just as <a href="http://www.coursey.com/" target="_blank">David Coursey</a> is allowed an opinion, here goes an attempt at mine.</p>
<p>1. Netbooks will be the world quicker then we will think.  As mobile data increases in demand, so will the devices that deliver it.  Though, it may not be in the tradition that we see today, but we will see either a more powerful cell phone or &#8216;netbook&#8217; in the near future that will blow our minds in what we can do from our finger tips.  Mainly the idea hit the shelf provided by Intel(for the most part) based on existing tech.  Nvidia and other companies haven&#8217;t even had time to plan into this at all.  Once they inject their hardware into the mix, we will see some serious power from these devices.  Accountability won&#8217;t be measured from behind a desk but from whether you&#8217;re actually out there effecting your business and the data will be available at the finger-tips. All of it. I&#8217;m getting a bit evangelical here and conclude my rebuttal on your first item here.</p>
<p>2. Whether the OS is free or not doesn&#8217;t seem to be a valid point then, if both can offer for free, then how is it even a failing point on Google&#8217;s part?  Brand recognition is mainly their fuel and they weigh in MUCH heavier then Linux would by itself, IF they go that route.  Notice this isn&#8217;t gOS, this is ChromeOS.</p>
<p>3. Eh, true Google Docs would take some serious overhauling, but with integration into say OpenOffice.  This could create a bridge between hardcore documentation and lightweight playtime with them.  Hell, they could come up with something new?  Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p>
<p>4. What? Just as the Palm Pre is built on the idea of real time feeds, I don&#8217;t see where Google Chrome would not be able to function in this lightweight environment from a netbook side.</p>
<p>5. Ok, now I know you are a pretend techie nerd guy.  WTF???  There is a means to an end to get anything working for cross platform support, whether is be creating a virtual environment within VMWare on Windows to host a MAC OS X box, or VMWare Fusion for Apple.  Linux does not fall short in the ability to create these same environments, Wine, VirtualBox, etc.  Hell, stop the war, include MS Office in it!</p>
<p>I think that the simple idea of &#8220;Googling&#8221; could be enough brand recognition and allow folks another solid option other then Ubuntu as a platform to conduct day to day business.  The average user doesn&#8217;t care what powers the device, it could be a fucking squirrel on a wheel inside the iPhone, they don&#8217;t care.  Ah, a fruitless conversation I think.  Too much is what if at this point and no one can draw a solid conclusion anyway.  I will not rule anyone out at this point because it is a cut throat market and new players coming in do have a chance to take out anyone else in this radical environment.  Which that being said, sadly this <a href="http://www.coursey.com/" target="_blank">nimrod</a>, could be right.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inverseflux.com/2009/07/08/google-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
